Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max: Vision Leaderboard Showdown
| Claude Fable 5 | Qwen3.8 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Anthropic | Alibaba |
| Text & Chat | #4 · 1503 | #21 · 1482 |
| Coding | #18 · 1624 | #9 · 1672 |
| AI Agents | #8 · 9.27 | #26 · 2.05 |
| Vision | #1 · 1309 | #2 · 1301 |
| Web Search | #5 · 1230 | — |
| Official price | $10 / $50 per 1M in/out | $2 / $6 per 1M in/out |
| On this site | — | — |
Verdict
Claude Fable 5 holds the #1 Vision spot with a HuaLinYuan Index of 1309, edging out Qwen3.8 Max at #2 with 1301. The gap is narrow, but Anthropic's model also leads in Text & Chat (#4 vs #21) and AI Agents (#8 vs #26). Qwen3.8 Max counters with a stronger Coding rank (#9 vs #18) and a dramatically lower price: $2/$6 per 1M tokens versus $10/$50. Neither model is currently usable on this site.
Choose Claude Fable 5 if
- Best overall vision quality
- Stronger general chat and agents
Choose Qwen3.8 Max if
- Superior coding performance
- Far lower token cost
Compare them yourself
Ask the same question to several top models at once on LongHua AI and pick the best answer.