Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 4.7: Which Is Better?
| Claude Fable 5.1 | Claude Opus 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Text & Chat | #7 · 1501 | #6 · 1501 |
| Coding | #5 · 1743 | — |
| AI Agents | #6 · 11.74 | — |
| Vision | #13 · 1288 | #4 · 1298 |
| Web Search | — | #4 · 1233 |
| Official price | $10 / $50 per 1M in/out | $5 / $25 per 1M in/out |
| On this site | — | — |
Verdict
On the Text & Chat board, Claude Opus 4.7 holds a slight edge at #6, while Claude Fable 5.1 sits at #7, though both share the same HuaLinYuan Index of 1501. Fable 5.1 shows broader strength across Coding (#5) and AI Agents (#6), while Opus 4.7 performs better in Vision (#4) and Web Search (#4). Price is a major difference: Opus 4.7 costs $5.0 per 1M input tokens and $25.0 per 1M output tokens, half of Fable 5.1's $10.0 / $50.0 rates. Neither model is currently usable on this site, so the practical choice depends on whether you value broader board coverage or lower cost.
Choose Claude Fable 5.1 if
- Choose Fable 5.1 for stronger Coding and AI Agents rankings.
- Pick Fable 5.1 if broader benchmark coverage matters most.
Choose Claude Opus 4.7 if
- Choose Opus 4.7 for better Vision and Web Search rankings.
- Pick Opus 4.7 if lower token pricing is important.
Compare them yourself
Ask the same question to several top models at once on LongHua AI and pick the best answer.