Claude Opus 4.7 vs. ERNIE 5.1: Web Search Performance
| Claude Opus 4.7 | ERNIE 5.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Anthropic | Baidu |
| Text & Chat | #6 · 1501 | #39 · 1467 |
| Vision | #4 · 1298 | — |
| Web Search | #4 · 1233 | #6 · 1227 |
| Official price | $5 / $25 per 1M in/out | — |
| On this site | — | — |
Verdict
Claude Opus 4.7 and ERNIE 5.1 represent competitive options in the Web Search category, holding the 4th and 6th positions on the HuaLinYuan Index, respectively. With index scores of 1233 and 1227, the performance gap between these models is marginal. Claude Opus 4.7 offers broader utility across Text & Chat and Vision boards, though it carries a premium price point of $5.00 per million input tokens. ERNIE 5.1 provides a specialized alternative for users focused on Baidu's ecosystem. Neither model is currently available for direct use on this site, requiring users to rely on these rankings to determine which model best aligns with their specific search requirements.
- Prioritizing high-performance vision and text capabilities
- Seeking top-tier indexed search performance
- Utilizing Baidu's specialized search infrastructure
- Requiring a competitive, focused search model
Ask the same question to several top models at once on LongHua AI and pick the best answer.