Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.5: Web Search Performance Compared
| Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Text & Chat | #6 · 1501 | #23 · 1481 |
| Vision | #4 · 1298 | #14 · 1287 |
| Web Search | #4 · 1233 | #3 · 1242 |
| AI Agents | — | #13 · 4.71 |
| Official price | $5 / $25 per 1M in/out | $5 / $30 per 1M in/out |
| On this site | — | — |
Verdict
In the HuaLinYuan Web Search category, GPT-5.5 holds a slight edge with a rank of #3 and an index of 1242, compared to Claude Opus 4.7, which ranks #4 with an index of 1233. While both models are currently unavailable on our site, their cost structures differ; GPT-5.5 carries a higher output cost at $30.0 per million tokens versus $25.0 for Claude Opus 4.7. Both share an identical input cost of $5.0 per million tokens. Choosing between them depends on whether you prioritize the marginal performance lead of GPT-5.5 or the more cost-effective output pricing offered by Claude Opus 4.7.
Choose Claude Opus 4.7 if
- Lower cost per million output tokens
- Strong performance in vision tasks
Choose GPT-5.5 if
- Higher ranking in Web Search
- Better performance for AI agents
Compare them yourself
Ask the same question to several top models at once on LongHua AI and pick the best answer.