Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol: Coding Comparison
| Claude Opus 5 | GPT-6.1 Sol | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Text & Chat | #12 · 1490 | #19 · 1484 |
| Coding | #6 · 1690 | #4 · 1760 |
| AI Agents | #9 · 8.21 | #2 · 13.81 |
| Vision | #12 · 1289 | #8 · 1291 |
| Official price | $5 / $25 per 1M in/out | $2 / $10 per 1M in/out |
| On this site | — | — |
Verdict
On the Coding board, GPT-6.1 Sol sits at #4 with a HuaLinYuan Index of 1760, ahead of Claude Opus 5 at #6 (Index 1690). Both are currently unavailable on this site. Pricing differs markedly: GPT-6.1 Sol charges $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens, while Opus 5 costs $5 and $25 respectively. For pure coding performance per the leaderboard, GPT-6.1 Sol holds the edge; Opus 5 trails slightly but may appeal if its other capabilities (Text & Chat #12, Agents #9) better match a broader workflow.
Choose Claude Opus 5 if
- Need stronger general chat and agent scores
- Prefer Anthropic's model behavior and safety
Choose GPT-6.1 Sol if
- Want the highest coding leaderboard rank
- Seek lower per-token cost for large workloads
Compare them yourself
Ask the same question to several top models at once on LongHua AI and pick the best answer.