Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol: Which Is Better?
| Claude Opus 5.5 | GPT-6.1 Sol | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Text & Chat | #3 · 1508 | #19 · 1484 |
| Coding | #1 · 1811 | #4 · 1760 |
| AI Agents | #1 · 17.89 | #2 · 13.81 |
| Vision | — | #8 · 1291 |
| Official price | $4 / $20 per 1M in/out | $2 / $10 per 1M in/out |
| On this site | — | — |
Verdict
Claude Opus 5.5 is the stronger performer on the focus board, holding Coding #1 with a HuaLinYuan Index of 1811 against GPT-6.1 Sol's Coding #4 at 1760. It also leads on Text & Chat (#3 vs #19) and AI Agents (#1 vs #2), making it the clearer choice for demanding coding and agent workflows. GPT-6.1 Sol counters on cost: at $2.0 input and $10.0 output per 1M tokens, it is half the price of Opus 5.5, and it adds a Vision #8 ranking that Anthropic's entry lacks here. Neither model is usable on this site yet, so this comparison reflects board standings and official pricing only.
Choose Claude Opus 5.5 if
- Top-ranked coding performance matters most
- You need leading AI agent and chat capability
Choose GPT-6.1 Sol if
- Budget-friendly pricing at half the cost
- You also want a vision-capable model
Compare them yourself
Ask the same question to several top models at once on LongHua AI and pick the best answer.