Nano Banana 2.1 vs GPT Image 2: Text-to-Image Comparison
| Nano Banana 2.1 | GPT Image 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | OpenAI | |
| Text-to-Image | #6 · 1328 | #3 · 1383 |
| Image Editing | #6 · 1428 | #3 · 1462 |
| Official price | $1.50 / $7.50 per 1M in/out | — |
| On this site | — | — |
Verdict
GPT Image 2 ranks higher on the Text-to-Image board (#3, Index 1383) versus Nano Banana 2.1 (#6, Index 1328), indicating stronger overall generation quality. Nano Banana 2.1 publishes a clear token-based price ($1.50 input / $7.50 output per 1M tokens), while GPT Image 2 pricing is not listed. Neither model is currently usable on this site. If transparent per-token cost matters, Nano Banana 2.1 has the edge; if leaderboard position is the priority, GPT Image 2 leads.
Choose Nano Banana 2.1 if
- Need predictable token pricing
- Prefer Google ecosystem integration
Choose GPT Image 2 if
- Want higher ranked generation quality
- Trust OpenAI model lineage
Compare them yourself
Ask the same question to several top models at once on LongHua AI and pick the best answer.