Claude Opus 4.6 vs Sonnet 4.6: Web Search Showdown
| Claude Opus 4.6 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Text & Chat | #5 · 1503 | #37 · 1472 |
| Vision | #3 · 1299 | #25 · 1275 |
| Web Search | #2 · 1253 | #7 · 1221 |
| Official price | $5 / $25 per 1M in/out | $3 / $15 per 1M in/out |
| On this site | — | — |
Verdict
On the Web Search board, Claude Opus 4.6 sits at #2 with a HuaLinYuan Index of 1253, while Sonnet 4.6 ranks #7 at 1221 — a 32-point gap. Opus also leads on Text & Chat (#5 vs #37) and Vision (#3 vs #25). However, Opus costs $5/$25 per 1M tokens versus Sonnet's $3/$15, making Sonnet 40% cheaper on input and output. Neither model is currently usable on this site. Choose Opus for peak search and reasoning quality; pick Sonnet for solid performance at lower cost.
Choose Claude Opus 4.6 if
- Need top-tier web search accuracy
- Prioritize best overall reasoning
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 if
- Want strong search at lower price
- Balance cost and capability
Compare them yourself
Ask the same question to several top models at once on LongHua AI and pick the best answer.