Claude Opus 4.7 vs Sonnet 4.6: Web Search Comparison
| Claude Opus 4.7 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Text & Chat | #6 · 1501 | #37 · 1472 |
| Vision | #4 · 1298 | #25 · 1275 |
| Web Search | #4 · 1233 | #7 · 1221 |
| Official price | $5 / $25 per 1M in/out | $3 / $15 per 1M in/out |
| On this site | — | — |
Verdict
On the Web Search board, Claude Opus 4.7 sits at #4 (Index 1233) while Sonnet 4.6 is #7 (Index 1221), giving Opus a measurable edge in search-augmented tasks. Opus also leads on Text & Chat (#6 vs #37) and Vision (#4 vs #25). The trade-off is price: Opus charges $5/$25 per 1M tokens (in/out) versus Sonnet's $3/$15. Neither model is available on this site yet, so current access is equal. Choose Opus when search quality matters most; choose Sonnet when budget per token is the priority.
Choose Claude Opus 4.7 if
- Higher Web Search rank needed
- Stronger overall capabilities required
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 if
- Lower per-token cost preferred
- Adequate search performance sufficient
Compare them yourself
Ask the same question to several top models at once on LongHua AI and pick the best answer.